Get a demo

Month-end close

Cut your close cycle. Reconcile in-transit, post journal entries to NetSuite, and surface clearing-account exceptions automatically. Accounting builds the flows, no engineering required.

Get a demo

The prompt

I want to automate parts of my month-end close. Build me a flow that reconciles in-transit transactions between my ecommerce platform and NetSuite, formats a journal entry file the way NetSuite needs it, and scans my clearing accounts for transactions that never closed out. Output the JE-ready file and a flagged list of items the accounting team needs to review.

Just copy and paste the prompt into a new Parabola flow to get started.

What Parabola builds

A workflow with seven steps you can edit:

1. Pull transactions from each system. Shopify or your ecommerce platform, NetSuite or your ERP, your AP system, your 3PL stack. The flow connects to each source.

2. Match in-transit transactions. Compare what shipped, what cleared, and what is sitting in the in-transit account. Line up by reference ID and amount.

3. Format the journal entry file. NetSuite wants a specific column order, account coding, and date format. The flow outputs a file NetSuite imports cleanly the first time.

4. Scan the clearing accounts. Surface transactions that should have closed out and did not. Flag aging, dollar amount, and which side of the entry is missing.

5. Roll up the period. Aggregate by entity, brand, channel, or whatever your reporting cut is.

6. Output the close package. JE file ready for upload, exception list for accounting review, and a roll-up report for the controller.

7. Run it every period. Daily through the close window, weekly between closes, or on-demand when the controller asks.

Why teams stop doing this manually

Close is a stack of reconciliations. In-transit accounts that should net to zero never quite do. Journal entries get prepped in one tool, reformatted for NetSuite in another, and posted by hand from the third. Clearing accounts accumulate transactions that nobody noticed got stuck.

The manual version works at small scale. One brand, one warehouse, one payment provider, and a five-person accounting team can grind through it. Add a second brand, a third 3PL, or a retailer with weird remittance formatting and the close stretches. Reformatting JE files for NetSuite starts to be its own job. The team stops asking "what does the data say" and starts asking "did the file load."

The work is precise but not high-judgment. Reconcile by reference, reformat to spec, post to system. That is exactly the kind of work that lives in a flow.

How it works

Step 1. Paste the prompt.

Open Parabola, paste the prompt in section 2, and let it ask follow-up questions about your ERP, your in-transit logic, and the format NetSuite expects for JE imports.

Step 2. Connect your data.

API connections to NetSuite, Shopify, your 3PL portal, and your AP system. Plus the templates and reference tables that define your account structure.

Step 3. Run it every period.

Daily during close. The flow regenerates the JE file, refreshes the exception list, and posts the roll-up. Accounting reviews the exceptions and approves the upload.

Related prompts

FAQ

Does this work with NetSuite?

Yes. The output is a JE-ready file in the exact format NetSuite expects on import. The flow can also pull live data from NetSuite as a source for the in-transit and clearing-account scans.

How is this different from a NetSuite native close checklist?

The native checklist tracks tasks. This flow does the work behind the tasks. It actually reconciles the in-transit account, formats the JE, and surfaces the exceptions. The checklist still works on top.

Can the flow handle multiple brands or entities?

Yes. Tag each transaction with its brand or entity at the standardization step. The output splits by tag, so a multi-brand close runs through one flow instead of one per entity.

What happens to exceptions?

They land in a flagged list with the reason. Accounting reviews, makes the call, and either resolves the underlying transaction or accepts the variance. The flow re-runs against fresh data each period.

How is this different from doing the close in Excel?

Excel works fine for a one-entity, one-warehouse close. It breaks when JE imports need reformatting every period, when clearing accounts drift, and when the close stretches across systems. The flow runs on a schedule, handles inconsistent inputs, and shows every decision the close team made so the audit is straightforward.
Close on day five.
Paste the prompt, point it at your ERP and ecommerce stack, and let the close-cycle work run on its own.
Start for free